Which is better: a low-end HD or a mid-range SD camcorder?

Posted by video1 on August 25th, 2010

I want to get a video camera that has good picture quality above all. I know that in my price range nothing will be perfect quality, but I want the best I can afford. So- which would be better to get: a mid-range SD camcorder (0) like the Canon FS200 or a low-end HD camcorder from someone like Flip?

Flip Video Underwater Case for Select Flip Ultra and Flip UltraHD Video Cameras Flip Video Underwater Case for Select Flip Ultra and Flip UltraHD Video Cameras Paypal 9 Bids US $50.00 19m
Flip Video Ultra U1120 4 GB Camcorder White 2ND GENERATIONPLEASE READ Flip Video Ultra U1120 4 GB Camcorder White 2ND GENERATIONPLEASE READ Paypal 6 Bids US $31.00 2h 2m
Flip Video MinoHD F460 4 GB Camcorder Black Flip Video MinoHD F460 4 GB Camcorder Black Paypal 7 Bids US $22.50 2h 11m
Flip Video Ultra F230 1 GB Camcorder Black Flip Video Ultra F230 1 GB Camcorder Black Paypal 12 Bids US $26.00 5h 14m
   1

Other High Definition Video Camcorder Online

Posted in HD digital camcorder Tags: , , ,
«
»
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Which is better: a low-end HD or a mid-range SD camcorder?”

  1. Andy says:
    August 25, 2010 at 8:12 am

    go for Canon FS200 Flash Memory Camcorder with 37x Optical Zoom better

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Flip Book Maker Flip Video Converter Video Converter Factory Pro
Free T-Mobile phones on sale | Thanks to Best Savings Accounts, Conveyancing Fees and Used Cars
Powered by Yahoo! Answers