Which is better: a low-end HD or a mid-range SD camcorder?

Posted by video1 on August 25th, 2010

I want to get a video camera that has good picture quality above all. I know that in my price range nothing will be perfect quality, but I want the best I can afford. So- which would be better to get: a mid-range SD camcorder (0) like the Canon FS200 or a low-end HD camcorder from someone like Flip?

BRAND NEW Flip UltraHD Video Camera 1 Hour 4 GB White Silver FREE SHIPPING BRAND NEW Flip UltraHD Video Camera 1 Hour 4 GB White Silver FREE SHIPPING 9 Bids US $69.95 15h 44m
Cisco Flip UltraHD III 4 GB White Video Camcorder in Original BOX Cisco Flip UltraHD III 4 GB White Video Camcorder in Original BOX Paypal 2 Bids US $40.99 16h 28m
Flip Video UltraHD 2hrs 8 GB Camcorder IMMACULATE HDMI 7209 RECHARGEABLE Flip Video UltraHD 2hrs 8 GB Camcorder IMMACULATE HDMI 7209 RECHARGEABLE Paypal 10 Bids US $70.00 17h 47m
Flip Ultra HD Video Camera 4GB White Silver Flip Ultra HD Video Camera 4GB White Silver Paypal 2 Bids US $10.50 19h 14m
   1

Other High Definition Video Camcorder Online

Posted in HD digital camcorder Tags: , , ,
«
»
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Which is better: a low-end HD or a mid-range SD camcorder?”

  1. Andy says:
    August 25, 2010 at 8:12 am

    go for Canon FS200 Flash Memory Camcorder with 37x Optical Zoom better

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Flip Book Maker Flip Video Converter Video Converter Factory Pro
Free T-Mobile phones on sale | Thanks to Best Savings Accounts, Conveyancing Fees and Used Cars
Powered by Yahoo! Answers